[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted luatex-snapshot 20070626.2-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:08:17 +0200
Source: luatex-snapshot
Binary: luatex-snapshot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20070626.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian TeX Maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Description: 
 luatex-snapshot - snapshot of one next generation TeX engine
Changes: 
 luatex-snapshot (20070626.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream snapshot
     - Integrated the lua library lzlib, this defines tables with
       bindings for zlib (including eazy-to-use gzip support)
     - Updated to slnunicode version 1.1
     - Some small cleanups in the sparse array handling
     - Moved the raw byte support out of the valid unicode range
     - Fixed a bug in the OFM font reader
     - Removed the pdftex snap nodes (and associated primitives)
Files: 
 26688a32e4bda0dc1aa2162e3dc47a1e 761 tex optional luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.dsc
 e432b9fe16b7105fd4fc8f81cc9056f4 6096974 tex optional luatex-snapshot_20070626.2.orig.tar.gz
 4c33b4e1357bf77446aba297b8516d5f 3637 tex optional luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.diff.gz
 a2c6f16d9fb45c4f86c4f4484db33d63 1740958 tex optional luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGgRl60r9KownFsJQRAiEYAJ9pzPfol67eNnS+TUV7fvwJds1Q4wCfXQqq
tDahpM//shKv/xNGRgwgeVQ=
=cgG7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/luatex-snapshot/luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.diff.gz
luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/luatex-snapshot/luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1.dsc
luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/luatex-snapshot/luatex-snapshot_20070626.2-1_i386.deb
luatex-snapshot_20070626.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/luatex-snapshot/luatex-snapshot_20070626.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: