[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted mhc 0.25.1+20070620-1 (source all i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:29:27 +0900
Source: mhc
Binary: mhc-utils mhc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.25.1+20070620-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@debian.org>
Changed-By: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@debian.org>
Description: 
 mhc        - Message Harmonized Calendaring system
 mhc-utils  - Message Harmonized Calendaring system utilities
Closes: 430210
Changes: 
 mhc (0.25.1+20070620-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. (development snapshot, downloaded from
     `http://www.quickhack.net/mhc/arc/mhc-current-snap20070620.tar.gz')
   * debian/mhc-utils.postinst: Disable libpisock8 stuff. (closes: #430210)
   * debian/control:
     - Prefer emacs to emacs21.
     - Add emacs22 to Depends.
     - Remove emacs-snapshot from Depends.
Files: 
 6546d3413dfa494c9bfe2b41d0abf4f5 661 misc optional mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.dsc
 c4dd9441ca207d3bc6ac52a2153dbece 238561 misc optional mhc_0.25.1+20070620.orig.tar.gz
 bb89df8ab68331ae9867e95eedda85c0 21576 misc optional mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.diff.gz
 0fb726ec0afaf2b486b38340c1a0c8d4 169548 misc optional mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1_all.deb
 c065e7f51212100bb71e81ef4a28085e 106148 misc optional mhc-utils_0.25.1+20070620-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGfRI8gV4LPvpMUpgRAjBMAKDXMOHyg9YitjVPfS+JNprTPu9Z1QCg2C3d
Hi8u96os13MUxtH08mflr0k=
=iDM5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
mhc-utils_0.25.1+20070620-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mhc/mhc-utils_0.25.1+20070620-1_i386.deb
mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mhc/mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.diff.gz
mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mhc/mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1.dsc
mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mhc/mhc_0.25.1+20070620-1_all.deb
mhc_0.25.1+20070620.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/mhc/mhc_0.25.1+20070620.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: