[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted mathpartir 1.2-1 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:34:51 +0100
Source: mathpartir
Binary: mathpartir
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
Description: 
 mathpartir - LaTeX macros for typesetting inference rules
Closes: 350656
Changes: 
 mathpartir (1.2-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release, solves a minor glitch in the copyright note
     (closes: Bug#350656).
   * Standards-Version 3.7.2 (no change).
   * Do not install mathpartir.hva (it is no longer in this package but is
     now distributed with the hevea package).
   * Dependency on tex: now alternative tetex-bin or texlive-latex-base
   * Turn Build-Depends-Indep on debhelper, dpatch into Build-Depends.
   * debian/copyright: specify copyright holder.
   * debian/mathpartir.doc-base: fix abstract.
   * Use dh_installtex instead of hand-rolled postinst/postrm. As a consequence
     Build-Depend on tex-common, and Depend on ${misc:Depends}.
Files: 
 17d63f97dba1eb819601958d8e00b6a3 614 tex optional mathpartir_1.2-1.dsc
 7b205eb7fb68264f96ff7c567c165fcc 234171 tex optional mathpartir_1.2.orig.tar.gz
 603827912eaa84ea84f55c0beb9496ae 2169 tex optional mathpartir_1.2-1.diff.gz
 ce54698ff5d699b20a9732acf19642e2 32120 tex optional mathpartir_1.2-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+GdytzWmSeC6BMERArxGAKDIFHqS2YYfmepKbEn8/gUnHlGZ0wCfUOB5
/dcTqnlQiIUmZuEJjZPXa6Y=
=Leyw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
mathpartir_1.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mathpartir/mathpartir_1.2-1.diff.gz
mathpartir_1.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mathpartir/mathpartir_1.2-1.dsc
mathpartir_1.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mathpartir/mathpartir_1.2-1_all.deb
mathpartir_1.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/mathpartir/mathpartir_1.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: