[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gcin 1.3.1-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  4 Dec 2006 20:28:58 +0800
Source: gcin
Binary: gcin-qt3-immodule gcin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wen-Yen Chuang <caleb@calno.com>
Changed-By: Wen-Yen Chuang <caleb@calno.com>
Description: 
 gcin       - a GTK+ based input method platform for Chinese users
 gcin-qt3-immodule - a QT input method module with gcin as backend
Closes: 400374
Changes: 
 gcin (1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Set fallback option for im-switch. (Closes: #400374)
   * Fix gcin's postrm script so that it can be removed cleanly when
     libgtk2.0-bin is already removed. (This is scim's Ubuntu bug #52087)
   * debian/patches:
     - remove 20_fix-glibc2.4-with-amd64.dpatch because upstream had fixed this
       bug.
     - add 20_fix_installation_path_for_im-client.dpatch and
       40_fix_build_failure_in_big-endian_arch.dpatch.
Files: 
 37f46b058e857af1d70a6aaf9d3a0137 615 utils optional gcin_1.3.1-1.dsc
 246ee254706260a191ab7a7827224d1c 1678709 utils optional gcin_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
 ca7abdc3b30028ae3deca200868c4bc3 9289 utils optional gcin_1.3.1-1.diff.gz
 e0faf2197a3949824b620e995fb26238 1434228 utils optional gcin_1.3.1-1_i386.deb
 282f2e7d579e46de4b5bb2d4488232b4 36348 utils optional gcin-qt3-immodule_1.3.1-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFdCvm+C5cwEsrK54RAnXZAKCuLrCeF5OFa3bGmvf2EErYxJNrVQCfVhrB
SBvY5jMo6pOVeI5MWamBk6I=
=9qMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gcin-qt3-immodule_1.3.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcin/gcin-qt3-immodule_1.3.1-1_i386.deb
gcin_1.3.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.1-1.diff.gz
gcin_1.3.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.1-1.dsc
gcin_1.3.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.1-1_i386.deb
gcin_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: