[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pcsc-lite 1.3.2-5 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:37:45 +0100
Source: pcsc-lite
Binary: libpcsclite-dev libpcsclite1 pcscd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ludovic Rousseau <rousseau@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ludovic Rousseau <rousseau@debian.org>
Description: 
 libpcsclite-dev - Middleware to access a smart card using PC/SC (development files)
 libpcsclite1 - Middleware to access a smart card using PC/SC (library)
 pcscd      - Middleware to access a smart card using PC/SC (daemon side)
Closes: 404897 405025
Changes: 
 pcsc-lite (1.3.2-5) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * debian/pcscd.init: rewrite using /etc/init.d/skeleton as example.
     start rule do not call restart any more
     Closes: #404897 "pcscd: infinite loop when trying to start the daemon"
     Closes: #405025 "/etc/init.d/pcscd is a fork bomb"
Files: 
 fe054854cd167af9be7a64467431ada2 670 misc extra pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.dsc
 03aa89fb60f34d4d71ef4c3ca7573651 13238 misc extra pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.diff.gz
 845b82f787bdf6782e708342195abf9e 67176 misc extra pcscd_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
 37717e1eba5f25e3f675c733d29d4811 286766 libdevel optional libpcsclite-dev_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
 6ed04d870e21a0d68a73119723a1e96f 36724 libs optional libpcsclite1_1.3.2-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFlqTNP0qKj+B/HPkRAtsTAJ99UqVBAbFL+hPjP4d3L0g0I5GksgCgjar2
XWm+6uxNOH44ixGlYhnr0yg=
=hpJd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libpcsclite-dev_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcsc-lite/libpcsclite-dev_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
libpcsclite1_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcsc-lite/libpcsclite1_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.diff.gz
pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite_1.3.2-5.dsc
pcscd_1.3.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcsc-lite/pcscd_1.3.2-5_i386.deb



Reply to: