[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted archivemail 0.7.0-1 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:09:28 -0500
Source: archivemail
Binary: archivemail
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description: 
 archivemail - archive and compress your old email
Closes: 203282 250402 250410
Changes: 
 archivemail (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release, with many fixes, including these fixes to Debian
     bugs:
     - Fixed IMAP --delete which didn't work at all.  (Thanks Anand)
       Closes: #203282
     - Terminate each message in newly written mbox with an empty line if the
       message source is not an mbox-format folder.  (Thanks  Chung-chieh Shan)
       Closes: #250410
     - Mangle From_ in message body if the message source is not an mbox-format
       folder.  (Thanks Chung-chieh Shan)  Closes: #250402
     - Also merges most of my changes to the Debian package.
   * Re-enable test suite which works again.
Files: 
 20eab985b1ad8472b927a525675576be 699 mail optional archivemail_0.7.0-1.dsc
 087c9707daa6bb5c44cd052b6d71ce88 39820 mail optional archivemail_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz
 5e1f13c8e98f0b76025abe56a56b9148 4698 mail optional archivemail_0.7.0-1.diff.gz
 dbf1952555f5a72ad247d9249d77c7fa 30468 mail optional archivemail_0.7.0-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFVP202tp5zXiKP0wRAhDiAJ9utXA4b6AAJ82d5b6QupvpBGzvRACghwP/
fAhbBp3aWzem3/ZKkiRFLYs=
=BGg3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
archivemail_0.7.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/archivemail/archivemail_0.7.0-1.diff.gz
archivemail_0.7.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/archivemail/archivemail_0.7.0-1.dsc
archivemail_0.7.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/archivemail/archivemail_0.7.0-1_all.deb
archivemail_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/archivemail/archivemail_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: