[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnopernicus 1.0.5-1.1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:15:26 -0300
Source: gnopernicus
Binary: gnopernicus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mario Lang <mlang@debian.org>
Changed-By: Margarita Manterola <marga@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnopernicus - Screen reader for GNOME 2
Closes: 382958 383616
Changes: 
 gnopernicus (1.0.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload to fix Failure To Build From Source and to prevent
     breaking ScrollKeeper's database.
   * Included cdbs' simplepatchsys to include the needed patch.
   * Updated debhelper Build-Depends as required by cdbs.
   * Added debian/patches/01-libke-cflags.patch that makes libgtk-2.0
     a dependency of libke in configure.in. Thanks to James Westby
     for the patch. (Closes: #382958).
   * Stopped shipping /var/scrollkeeper.
   * Added a postinst snippet to fix systems where gnopernicus broke the
     scrollkeeper database. Thanks to Loic Minier for the patch.
     (Closes: #383616)
   * Added debian/patches/02_fix_segfault.patch to fix a segfault when
     starting gnopernicus without a running gconf instance.
Files: 
 0d9ed2976651d0fff23725ab1b2b0df8 995 x11 optional gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.dsc
 3ed19bb187ec7b8b41a94fc98544fc48 9682 x11 optional gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.diff.gz
 f7e2b9867eb0e922b974bb7783be20b0 2030334 x11 optional gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7Z9QlAuUx1tI/64RAsZ9AJ46qY1PxBY/tng+eGj6nyJNOZ1EGgCgnxg6
CeK8xgavOTAe3Q2Hi2JxQjs=
=Y7bS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.diff.gz
gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1.dsc
gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnopernicus/gnopernicus_1.0.5-1.1_i386.deb



Reply to: