[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sdl-ttf2.0 2.0.8-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:04:40 +0000
Source: sdl-ttf2.0
Binary: libsdl-ttf2.0-dev libsdl-ttf2.0-0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsdl-ttf2.0-0 - ttf library for Simple DirectMedia Layer with FreeType 2 support
 libsdl-ttf2.0-dev - development files for SDL ttf library (version 2.0)
Closes: 373108
Changes: 
 sdl-ttf2.0 (2.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Added no_freetype_internals.dpatch in order to avoid using freetype
     internals (cf. http://www.freetype.org/freetype2/freetype-2.2.0.html),
     closes: #373108.
   * Added a watch file.
   * Updated standards version to 3.7.2, no changes needed.
Files: 
 9a50e59f63dc35cb86cdc7418f4b5a86 720 libs optional sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.dsc
 094b6c08769e9842dbe1dfb5efa22df7 2457385 libs optional sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8.orig.tar.gz
 3fe9a385459a851c180dc4f224c43276 3142 libs optional sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
 415fd30644f294c9490e5741f6afd4cf 14494 libs optional libsdl-ttf2.0-0_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
 be4177cbe241e2f939e698cf28b81370 24302 libdevel optional libsdl-ttf2.0-dev_2.0.8-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEjfj9Iae1O4AJae8RAgerAJ9pioKFTL3Pk3Jy/gnWvaRjp1RqLgCeJfB2
wE9nA7U5wJVQvEevqZ/MLU4=
=Lw72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libsdl-ttf2.0-0_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdl-ttf2.0/libsdl-ttf2.0-0_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
libsdl-ttf2.0-dev_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sdl-ttf2.0/libsdl-ttf2.0-dev_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sdl-ttf2.0/sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sdl-ttf2.0/sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8-1.dsc
sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/sdl-ttf2.0/sdl-ttf2.0_2.0.8.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: