[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted shaper 2.2.12-0.7.3-2 (source all i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Source: shaper
Binary: shapecfg shaper
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.2.12-0.7.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David B. Harris <dbharris@debian.org>
Changed-By: David B. Harris <dbharris@debian.org>
Description: 
 shapecfg   - Bandwidth limiter for virtual network interfaces
 shaper     - Traffic shaper init script (cbq.init) for Linux
Changes: 
 shaper (2.2.12-0.7.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Modify last changelog entry (2.2.12-0.7.3-1) to remove erroneous
     "unreleased" tag.
   * Add '| debconf-2.0' to shaper Depends: to avoid blocking cdebconf
   * Update debian/copyright to note that Red Hat no longer maintains it
Files: 
 f6bf052e66b09844f035f07a5bc52b39 887 net extra shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.dsc
 2e418a9e99d88e22e1b3e7f9007c7510 12592 net extra shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.diff.gz
 f3852d539529803f5a1a46d0ab52e1b2 101872 net extra shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_all.deb
 c5d106a047237f5b2bbb6058cd464541 9366 net extra shapecfg_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBRHHmxWdoLXfrvKobAQK6qwgAnR87CpV3XSdU+XYUGtuJW/Pz2nVqczeL
T8Tp9w3YxbHfzG3WdQcoFqKkJqwE5h3SveNr/R0kJpBcel7y+Pej2jhcAApC2Z2/
YvYv9ab4BzYHehLDgeUET4zNMCW16nL1MIr88DpOL2mugzNHZAJS9kICSyJ22lPy
BbQHSYhOsIxDK7TiGQFewRkWXFLMCiQs/EXSBQd2XqeM9RU8v7XHiEMW7uHc9roI
W8ALV/Qad41gmMlon4FBXJGaWGB73mSHPvEdwZ7DWBVJpQWkiKEIgb/wxsUmDeqe
X1HpvOx54/+ZJ/TlKbQUcBGJ9QqD7P1sYGLsPGwi5t2ruAiJ3hK1Hg==
=ckKt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
shapecfg_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/shaper/shapecfg_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_i386.deb
shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/shaper/shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.diff.gz
shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/shaper/shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2.dsc
shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/shaper/shaper_2.2.12-0.7.3-2_all.deb



Reply to: