Accepted nslu2-utils 0.10+r58-2 (source all arm)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:48:56 -0400
Source: nslu2-utils
Binary: slugimage nslu2-utils
Architecture: source arm all
Version: 0.10+r58-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description:
nslu2-utils - utilities and init scripts for the Linksys NSLU2
slugimage - NSUL2 firmare image manipulation utility
Changes:
nslu2-utils (0.10+r58-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add initramfs-tools integration based on scripts originally by tbm:
- Include ixp ethernet modules in initramfs if they're available.
- Add hook script to handle the root=/dev/ram mess with the slug
bootloader.
* Split slugimage out into its own arch indep package since it can be used
on other architectures.
* Build-depend on debhelper 5.0.30, which is needed to support building this
package on !arm !armeb architectures.
* Remove postinst code to create obsolete /dev/leds file.
* Add call to update-initramfs in postinst.
* Add nslu2-flashkernel.
* Add NEWS.Debian file documenting upgrade process from d-i beta2 installs.
Files:
69867344162d8caa822a44fa9ef8f129 690 admin extra nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.dsc
753bdc74b5651fe0d9960de7524c661e 17174 admin extra nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.diff.gz
943bafe758aca599f4c38b829cc0e345 15002 admin extra slugimage_0.10+r58-2_all.deb
5a0209aa0680beb6e6db4439c198df5b 12038 admin extra nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2_arm.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEP8a62tp5zXiKP0wRAkcdAKCi0lqZbbvaPN1iKP4wzgRCs3pHaACcCBBM
95VUFy09BeC9Oqyui/f0lmc=
=wp8V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nslu2-utils/nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.diff.gz
nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.dsc
to pool/main/n/nslu2-utils/nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2.dsc
nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2_arm.deb
to pool/main/n/nslu2-utils/nslu2-utils_0.10+r58-2_arm.deb
slugimage_0.10+r58-2_all.deb
to pool/main/n/nslu2-utils/slugimage_0.10+r58-2_all.deb
Reply to: