[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted epydoc 2.1-10 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:50:13 -0500
Source: epydoc
Binary: python-epydoc epydoc-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Changed-By: Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Description: 
 epydoc-doc - official documentation for the Epydoc package
 python-epydoc - tool for generating Python API documentation
Changes: 
 epydoc (2.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Remove obsolete debian/python2.[123]-epydoc files (leftovers).
   * Change debian/rules to remove obsolete python2.[123] references.
   * Remove references to python2.1 and python2.2 and make python2.4 the default
     - Update documentation in debian/README.Debian
     - Change Depends and Build-Depends-Indep to use python2.4
     - Update package descriptions to remove obsolete information
     - Change debian/python-epydoc.install to reference python2.4
     - Change python search order in debian/python-epydoc.postinst
     - Change debian/rules to use python2.4 to build the package
Files: 
 73b12daa5cdb998334aeb2c21ec15228 601 python optional epydoc_2.1-10.dsc
 ba389a49eba827267f452e4e06b2d15a 10144 python optional epydoc_2.1-10.diff.gz
 21492b680f1ed46c32dae1dfa7ac5c69 166698 python optional python-epydoc_2.1-10_all.deb
 6d4f8fccfa47f074ef518ed30cd4bd1b 388556 doc optional epydoc-doc_2.1-10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEQRpw8On2ujzZUQQRApcbAKCPgohq7xq/zUT3sTVOwZz0jZ5OrQCgoVQ3
veGHcjWnfJDJJvPJ7OxACiU=
=pS8v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
epydoc-doc_2.1-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/epydoc/epydoc-doc_2.1-10_all.deb
epydoc_2.1-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epydoc/epydoc_2.1-10.diff.gz
epydoc_2.1-10.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epydoc/epydoc_2.1-10.dsc
python-epydoc_2.1-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/e/epydoc/python-epydoc_2.1-10_all.deb



Reply to: