Accepted lyx 1.3.6-1.1 (source i386 all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:34:09 +0100
Source: lyx
Binary: lyx-qt lyx-common lyx-xforms lyx
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.3.6-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LyX Maintainers <pkg-lyx-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Per Olofsson <pelle@debian.org>
Description:
lyx - High Level Word Processor
lyx-common - High Level Word Processor - common files
lyx-qt - High Level Word Processor - Qt frontend
lyx-xforms - High Level Word Processor - XForms frontend
Closes: 342538
Changes:
lyx (1.3.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* NMU.
* Medium urgency for RC bugfix.
* Removed build-dep on xlibs-dev which doesn't exist anymore. It seems
that the other build-dep'd packages depend on individual X -dev
packages in turn.
* Rebuild against libaiksaurus-1.2-0c2a (libstdc++ allocator change).
Closes: #342538.
Files:
03cbccda65b58f1d7c32f8dcf61d71ee 842 editors optional lyx_1.3.6-1.1.dsc
5553e5309edcbb2417e8e92f385a1699 22268 editors optional lyx_1.3.6-1.1.diff.gz
7e10855b0896b02623c22ab9617b9dba 1862644 editors optional lyx-qt_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
422afa7b1b7fa38b368deb84d008f42a 1753766 editors optional lyx-xforms_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
42184f7cd1cb399ceef9039d11e528dc 17172 editors optional lyx_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
fdc88981b2ff0bcfb1d5849fc69e8dd2 3814188 editors optional lyx-common_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDyUI4eDAsS42/7C8RApf4AJ0SaUco26w7OgPjh+suOcoWuxnqZgCeNuxi
WQzIBAHUmxnTGU2IH/cq0mo=
=Y9jI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
lyx-common_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx-common_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
lyx-qt_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx-qt_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
lyx-xforms_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx-xforms_1.3.6-1.1_i386.deb
lyx_1.3.6-1.1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx_1.3.6-1.1.diff.gz
lyx_1.3.6-1.1.dsc
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx_1.3.6-1.1.dsc
lyx_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lyx/lyx_1.3.6-1.1_all.deb
Reply to: