[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted spamassassin 3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1 (source all i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:01:11 -0400
Source: spamassassin
Binary: spamassassin spamc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>
Changed-By: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>
Description: 
 spamassassin - Perl-based spam filter using text analysis
 spamc      - Client for SpamAssassin spam filtering daemon
Closes: 288617
Changes: 
 spamassassin (3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Upstream bug fixes:
     - MIME boundary regexp improved (Closes: #288617)
Files: 
 41f31197e3a379a384a1b9809ccb2ce7 756 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.dsc
 41fe5c0c5ab226e0d33de20c10f69240 1184411 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2.orig.tar.gz
 2c0495167a963dbc239a56fba0f6a7b9 26726 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.diff.gz
 506292cf47422904c78a3a885169f255 993748 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_all.deb
 cf1090f274b6d93fa2c42c93075da3dc 136328 mail optional spamc_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDE+FRqjUzNGvmnNARAp15AKCd4pyv0fcBYDFzG/ZDikhZ2jS/BwCfUGeU
OceXYtTxnx2Lr2Yb2dRNSk0=
=pl7L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.diff.gz
spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1.dsc
spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_all.deb
spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2.orig.tar.gz
spamc_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamc_3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1_i386.deb



Reply to: