Accepted tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:39:49 +0100
Source: tetex-bin
Binary: libkpathsea3 tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
libkpathsea-dev - path search library for teTeX (devel part)
libkpathsea3 - path search library for teTeX (runtime part)
tetex-bin - The teTeX binary files
Closes: 288182 289845
Changes:
tetex-bin (2.0.2-26) unstable; urgency=high
.
* SECURITY UPDATE: Added a patch to fix one more buffer overflow in xpdf
code (CAN-2005-0064). The patch was provided by a Red Hat engineer;
thanks to Joey for informing me very fast.
* Correct the syntax error in the patch to xdvizilla, thanks to Giuseppe
Bonacci <g.bonacci@libero.it> (closes: #289845) [frank]
* Correctly save and reset $IFS in postinst (closes: #288182) [frank]
Files:
8d85401abce2a1f8f98f73083f308082 994 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.dsc
a7733dde0e6ec49d777ddb6f22f8c06e 183634 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.diff.gz
d5322a102b714bb312e539e53b31e5fc 3935412 tex optional tetex-bin_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
e31db019edcc7431d4f27450ba8840da 58264 libs optional libkpathsea3_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
5a40fd17279b6255b670938ae706329f 66212 libdevel optional libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB7WfA+xs9YyJS+hoRAqz2AJ90SRNse0Q5iD/Hqk8eW9dFZc0t2gCfTZ23
U6cWP2GCgYz8kvMSu5nK0J0=
=jXF1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea-dev_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
libkpathsea3_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/libkpathsea3_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.diff.gz
tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.dsc
tetex-bin_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_2.0.2-26_i386.deb
Reply to: