Accepted kfreebsd-5 5.4-7 (source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:40:59 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-5
Binary: kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-586-smp kfreebsd-headers-5-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-586 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-486 kfreebsd-image-5-586-smp kfreebsd-headers-5-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-586-smp kfreebsd-headers-5-586 kfreebsd-headers-5-586-smp kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-486 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-686-smp kfreebsd-image-5-486 kfreebsd-image-5-586 kfreebsd-headers-5-486 kfreebsd-source-5.4 kfreebsd-image-5-686 kfreebsd-headers-5.4-1 kfreebsd-image-5.4-1-586
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Description:
kfreebsd-source-5.4 - source code for kernel of FreeBSD 5.4 with Debian patches
Closes: 335338 335866 338378
Changes:
kfreebsd-5 (5.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Enabled ALTQ support (closes: bug#338378).
* Added 586-smp flavor, seems those machines are existing.
* Don't ship fsck.cd9660.
* Moved arch config files to debian/arch/$(cpu)/.
* Gzip /boot/kernel/kernel (closes: bug#335866).
* Fixed 901_loader_conf.diff (closes: bug#335338).
Files:
695f9d4f92d2533d1665276e1bdeb1bb 1443 devel optional kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.dsc
1f160d71a25f45059460172756772825 35067 devel optional kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.diff.gz
f6f44475dad10f1e05e8594fae1592bc 13130092 devel optional kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-7_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFDd3Anw3ao2vG823MRArheAJj7XgY+q30BsygdoMHhjMkwmdXjAJ431xLB
7Wxs5F3z8rKMbHsCu4Jk8A==
=ngBa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.diff.gz
kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.dsc
to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-5_5.4-7.dsc
kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-7_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kfreebsd-5/kfreebsd-source-5.4_5.4-7_all.deb
Reply to: