[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted udev 0.070-3 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  8 Oct 2005 19:15:28 +0200
Source: udev
Binary: udev udev-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.070-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Description: 
 udev       - /dev/ and hotplug management daemon
 udev-udeb  - /dev/ and hotplug management daemon (udeb)
Closes: 294843 329226
Changes: 
 udev (0.070-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added support for coldplug and merged the hotplug scripts left.
     Switched from udevstart to udevsynthesize. (Closes: #329226)
   * Rearranged the init script actions. (Closes: #294843)
   * Added conflicts with hotplug and with module-init-tools releases without
     support for /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/.
   * New patch hotplug_input_events, from Ubuntu: runs the hotplug.d/
     scripts on $DEVPATH-less input events from the kernel. (See #328685.)
   * Removed from postinst and the init script an extra check for tmpfs
     brokeness in old kernels.
   * Removed support for upgrades from packages older than 0.046-1.
Files: 
 26e6e88a4ac2900a35b38960de0bedd0 578 admin optional udev_0.070-3.dsc
 40107ba5dcdd305d03d7394aa65558ff 42984 admin optional udev_0.070-3.diff.gz
 5b92f040136cb2ba7264be9758ad53c5 314352 admin optional udev_0.070-3_i386.deb
 9e9bbb0552707dfe98e925d402645959 57258 debian-installer optional udev-udeb_0.070-3_i386.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDSA9OFGfw2OHuP7ERAppNAKCWbQNGx9dkgllSlz7I4m/jHmdEOgCfWp2v
KSwbr2LeOCEVBCqPb2YjmG0=
=rWIb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
udev-udeb_0.070-3_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev-udeb_0.070-3_i386.udeb
udev_0.070-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.070-3.diff.gz
udev_0.070-3.dsc
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.070-3.dsc
udev_0.070-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.070-3_i386.deb



Reply to: