[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pspp 0.4.0-1 (source i386)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:45:36 -0400
Source: pspp
Binary: pspp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt <jrv@debian.org>
Changed-By: James R. Van Zandt <jrv@debian.org>
Description: 
 pspp       - Statistical analysis tool
Changes: 
 pspp (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (fixes: Bug#259615,Bug#328545)
   * debian/control: update Debian policy version (no changes needed),
     update program description, add libplot-dev to Build-Depends, bump
     debhelper version to 4.0
   * debian/watch: update format to version 3
   * debian/rules: eliminate support for debian-test, install pspp-mode.el,
     revert to Makefile commands to build .html documentation.  Build and
     install .pdf documentation.  Register .html and .pdf files with
     doc-base.  Eliminate deprecated DH_COMPAT setting.
   * debian/README: eliminate outdated material, add pointers on
     documentation and the Emacs mode.
Files: 
 d41f6525a05d632943dc695e34de6ace 717 math optional pspp_0.4.0-1.dsc
 637bb190ae21bd3aee9ea2ce7ce81896 1566807 math optional pspp_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
 ee48c0d8d520ef8b8e5cef4a450ff0fb 18094 math optional pspp_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
 718783bff1075eea1248ba8b9094a4e5 1257648 math optional pspp_0.4.0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCUAwUBQzXLCzHnPxTimJZtAQE/jgP4krUQSYnFzl7wGKBs9VffUZoMUIi0uzDP
KpqM6CrnmAIUm7Mty9MoxG110+PGOMt4CKzJE1S29YkRkrH9014cs1AJWzCtgjZK
LLoZirDy8+zEy/zQr9d3OW3hpvfKiLxha1falzQPRhqdxRIoiu0GAnD09KmKljTI
uJNfa0Otow==
=hhcA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
pspp_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pspp/pspp_0.4.0-1.diff.gz
pspp_0.4.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pspp/pspp_0.4.0-1.dsc
pspp_0.4.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pspp/pspp_0.4.0-1_i386.deb
pspp_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pspp/pspp_0.4.0.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: