[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted reportbug 3.16 (source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:57:31 -0400
Source: reportbug
Binary: reportbug
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Description: 
 reportbug  - reports bugs in the Debian distribution
Closes: 322720 322852 323070 323595 323801 324006 324341
Changes: 
 reportbug (3.16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "widows and orphans" release (aka hopefully the last release
     before I start hacking on reportbug 4).
   * Use mbox format when accessing the Debian BTS.  This will hopefully
     avoid breakage due to presentation changes--at least for report pages;
     summary pages are a different story.  (Closes: #322720 et al.)
     You will now see relevant mails to the control@b.d.o address too.
   * Don't store realname/email unless non-default on config run.
     (Closes: #324341)
   * Fix typo in orphaned-package message.  (Closes: #324006, #323070)
   * Fix WNPP reporting for orphaning packages.  (Closes: #323801)
   * vi nag now includes how to disable it.  (Closes: #322852)
   * Better handling for the case where $HOME doesn't exist during a
     config run.  (Closes: #323595)
Files: 
 8978f4119f13d41e50b1bc0ea89c2800 522 utils standard reportbug_3.16.dsc
 010c6dbe85a838f734cac938faf2c53d 135627 utils standard reportbug_3.16.tar.gz
 dff9014adaffb1fd1825ae5c132ffd69 126768 utils standard reportbug_3.16_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCWrW2wQKE6PXubwRApZ7AJ9/Q0OCRFpnwz154agu5TNtOnJawACcC1Tm
jAAc6H6nU7UZRXLMw+tjJ6w=
=LUBw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
reportbug_3.16.dsc
  to pool/main/r/reportbug/reportbug_3.16.dsc
reportbug_3.16.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/reportbug/reportbug_3.16.tar.gz
reportbug_3.16_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/reportbug/reportbug_3.16_all.deb



Reply to: