[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted anjuta 1.2.4-1 (source i386 all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:54:44 +0100
Source: anjuta
Binary: anjuta anjuta-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rob Bradford <robster@debian.org>
Changed-By: Rob Bradford <robster@debian.org>
Description: 
 anjuta     - A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++
 anjuta-common - Data files for Anjuta
Closes: 277977 305800 305834 322996
Changes: 
 anjuta (1.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   - Typo fixed in anjuta_launcher.1. Patch from A Costa <agcosta@gis.net>
     forwarded upstream. (closes: #305800)
   - PHP syntax highlighting no longer hardcoded. Patch from Ashar Voultoiz
     <thoane@altern.org> forwarded upstream. (closes: #277977)
   - Rendering issues with Pango > 1.8.1 fixed. (closes: #322996
   * Now Build-Depends on gcc >= 4.0.0 which does not have stack corruption bug
     (closes: #305834)
Files: 
 45cbabcfddf80600e3fcff018a250566 759 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4-1.dsc
 5a709fbaedc816a88fd8b9ad5276a47b 7413573 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4.orig.tar.gz
 b5ec1cef8d9e9c5115b0596509841bbd 10192 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4-1.diff.gz
 5ee3c584a1a8ec4376b04c55a22f398d 5812400 devel optional anjuta-common_1.2.4-1_all.deb
 3bfd59a3215899c8b9212a84dca05837 922452 gnome optional anjuta_1.2.4-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC/7RDCw8pKd+B7oMRAopPAJsFsGsYnI/kF/NeTA95KkXJ4luYSACgh747
gPWo5aS7wudtexCp3eRk0DY=
=YzcG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
anjuta-common_1.2.4-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta-common_1.2.4-1_all.deb
anjuta_1.2.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4-1.diff.gz
anjuta_1.2.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4-1.dsc
anjuta_1.2.4-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4-1_i386.deb
anjuta_1.2.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: