Accepted zaptel 1:1.0.9-3 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:19:10 +0100
Source: zaptel
Binary: libtonezone1 zaptel-source zaptel libtonezone-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:1.0.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team <pkg-voip-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>
Description:
libtonezone-dev - tonezone library (development)
libtonezone1 - tonezone library (runtime)
zaptel - zapata telephony utilities
zaptel-source - Zapata telephony interface (source code for kernel driver)
Closes: 315251 316800
Changes:
zaptel (1:1.0.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Import bristuff-0.2.0-RC8j.dpatch
* Closes: #315251: zaptel should be in group comm
* Note that the cloned report is still active against ftp.debian.org
* Closes: #316800: zaptel package 1.0.9 ships headers
Files:
225219aee6b91bec44ed27051fc6ccb8 891 comm optional zaptel_1.0.9-3.dsc
cc4a474689a1e4512a6a2a8b5830443b 90481 comm optional zaptel_1.0.9-3.diff.gz
02f9d6843714316483edcc8c963efc37 271712 comm optional zaptel-source_1.0.9-3_all.deb
b3e13fb32ae9f0612bf9dd33ee59db20 11924 comm optional zaptel_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
bf1b5de3b42894aae1d63646461f29de 13086 libs optional libtonezone1_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
f87a3cdf93b630b4fd6d0a8c73ea9825 14066 libdevel optional libtonezone-dev_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC1kvXoCzanz0IthIRAgqSAJ49WR2xNxc/zd3wXxzQ3AVzT6hjeACgiaEk
xrR8nkxti6jMJjkFw+VZxt8=
=GBn/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
libtonezone-dev_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone-dev_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
libtonezone1_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zaptel/libtonezone1_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
zaptel-source_1.0.9-3_all.deb
to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel-source_1.0.9-3_all.deb
zaptel_1.0.9-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.9-3.diff.gz
zaptel_1.0.9-3.dsc
to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.9-3.dsc
zaptel_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zaptel/zaptel_1.0.9-3_i386.deb
Reply to: