[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnumach 1:20050501-2 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:42:29 +0300
Source: gnumach
Binary: gnumach gnumach-dev gnumach-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:20050501-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GNU Hurd Maintainers <debian-hurd@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
Description: 
 gnumach    - The GNU version of the Mach microkernel
 gnumach-dbg - The GNU version of the Mach microkernel for debugging
 gnumach-dev - The GNU version of the Mach microkernel
Changes: 
 gnumach (1:20050501-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add a system stabilizer patch.
     - debian/patches/14_alloc_params.patch.
     Thanks to Neal H. Walfield <neal@cs.uml.edu>.
   * Reverse the meaning of --enable-ide-forcedma.
     - debian/patches/13_ide_dma.patch.
     Thanks to Sergio López <koro@menteslibres.org> for noticing.
Files: 
 aa8dc5ba7c799cbda6a974c1722f7fe5 846 base optional gnumach_20050501-2.dsc
 8ea20e2a89ee61ee069e491809dde438 536113 base optional gnumach_20050501-2.diff.gz
 35a896ca94cd2cd2355ece134103ddc5 944350 base optional gnumach_20050501-2_i386.deb
 37433393817f804deee6f04407912a6f 3663462 devel extra gnumach-dbg_20050501-2_i386.deb
 fb8ce93ed7b4cf8ab6a89ad6ad1c0e46 128082 devel optional gnumach-dev_20050501-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFChjqYuW9ciZ2SjJsRAtjuAJ408x0rYATGt6Z04u2RM2OmtT+UQACgn9tf
xETtWsui4Q6BTQ2h1bp1I9U=
=8G+s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gnumach-dbg_20050501-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dbg_20050501-2_i386.deb
gnumach-dev_20050501-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dev_20050501-2_i386.deb
gnumach_20050501-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach_20050501-2.diff.gz
gnumach_20050501-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach_20050501-2.dsc
gnumach_20050501-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach_20050501-2_i386.deb



Reply to: