Accepted spamassassin 3.0.3-1 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:09:56 -0400
Source: spamassassin
Binary: spamassassin spamc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>
Changed-By: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>
Description:
spamassassin - Perl-based spam filter using text analysis
spamc - Client for SpamAssassin spam filtering daemon
Closes: 291561 293502 299118 307904
Changes:
spamassassin (3.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #307904)
- Fixed possible memory bloat from large AutoWhitelist db files
- Fixed where user defined rules scores became ignored (Closes: #291561)
- Updated parsing code for several Received: header formats
- Document plugin API for set/get tags (Closes: #299118)
- More bug fixes
* Added note about needing libnet-dns-perl to README.Debian (Closes: #293502)
* Would like this to get to sarge, if all goes well.
Files:
091f85b52dd48bc4213ac4ddc35572f2 776 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.3-1.dsc
ca96f23cd1eb7d663ab55db98ef8090c 999558 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
5cf0491edef3778341ee69f608d6f5a7 44458 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.3-1.diff.gz
a18f928efa0f542fe129c7674407d475 768642 mail optional spamassassin_3.0.3-1_all.deb
0d5d02c4f4b94709c7c5bdf76440f0fe 58370 mail optional spamc_3.0.3-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgWhnqjUzNGvmnNARAoxGAKDhbhl+zOg216x32tAi17Ajz3oSEwCeJoPG
2+gD8U5kawbwmEZx92g2oHI=
=nzR5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
spamassassin_3.0.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.3-1.diff.gz
spamassassin_3.0.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.3-1.dsc
spamassassin_3.0.3-1_all.deb
to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.3-1_all.deb
spamassassin_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
spamc_3.0.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamc_3.0.3-1_i386.deb
Reply to: