[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted decompyle2.2 2.2beta1-8 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:13:15 +1100
Source: decompyle2.2
Binary: decompyle2.2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2beta1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Description: 
 decompyle2.2 - old version of the Python byte-code decompiler
Changes: 
 decompyle2.2 (2.2beta1-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Repacked the old decompyle 2.2 as a separate source package, so that it
     can be installed alongside decompyle 2.3 or later.  The binary provided
     by this package has been renamed to /usr/bin/decompyle2.2.
 .
     This is being done since decompyle 2.3 contains some significant changes,
     and it is possible that it may have trouble with some older bytecode that
     decompyle 2.2 could handle successfully.  Since one of decompyle's
     functions is disaster recovery, it seems sensible to keep decompyle 2.2
     available.
Files: 
 2fc869a73dea4bc105e5b6dc83739ac5 609 python optional decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.dsc
 e193a679df8b06292276a21776676bf2 409925 python optional decompyle2.2_2.2beta1.orig.tar.gz
 ccedc2bdd4a3e7fb125439a8d4a5ba10 10123 python optional decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.diff.gz
 db612f1cd06f3ddb2be23c6963608e8e 56020 python optional decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB7D+OMQNuxza4YcERAn0EAJ9hKqUJ7mwH/Q43VAr5CEKnubrz6QCgj9W7
nUwtvLEJO57Kp/KKn9K8vGA=
=kNsv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/decompyle2.2/decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.diff.gz
decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.dsc
  to pool/main/d/decompyle2.2/decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8.dsc
decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/decompyle2.2/decompyle2.2_2.2beta1-8_i386.deb
decompyle2.2_2.2beta1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/decompyle2.2/decompyle2.2_2.2beta1.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: