Accepted nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:31:05 -0500
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nhfsstone nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg <chip@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chip Salzenberg <chip@debian.org>
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - Kernel NFS server support
nhfsstone - NFS benchmark program.
Closes: 165744 287053
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Acknowledge NMU; thanks to joeyh. (closes: #287053)
* New upstream version:
> Add support for NFSv4.
> Ignore SIGPIPE, fixing a remote DOS. Note that the previous
NMU already fixed this bug. (CAN-2004-1014)
> At long last, fix "erroneous SM_UNMON" warnings. (closes: #165744)
Files:
15e70406a93c10556738fc7617a0e040 663 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.dsc
73d8af4367c79f31f68a4ca45422fd17 401155 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
a3daa25e2f23347a731d75197cb3d70b 1219 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
42e900d67b49ca9777caecfb1f48e875 114478 net optional nfs-kernel-server_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
5fb822e5323b975de4288a288683b797 97062 net standard nfs-common_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
1951bfd637c4a5c1359d42dfe11a3ad4 42496 net extra nhfsstone_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB5Knze/7CYy/KUL0RAtzoAJ9xc21J5gGWiu1MpIhw6zamMCsPvwCfQ+Rd
op+7j8xd+Po3mhp62o35t68=
=xmgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
nfs-common_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
nfs-kernel-server_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.7-1.dsc
nfs-utils_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
nhfsstone_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nhfsstone_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
Reply to: