[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pdl 1:2.4.2-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:59:25 +0100
Source: pdl
Binary: pdl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Henning Glawe <glaweh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Henning Glawe <glaweh@debian.org>
Description: 
 pdl        - perl data language: Perl extensions for numerics
Changes: 
 pdl (1:2.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream release
   * remove comment about not including m51.fits from debian/copyright
   * re-import COPYING to debian/copyright
   * include perldl.conf used in "official" package as debian/perldl.conf
   * install Known_problems to docdir
   * fix clean target in upstream makefiles
   * use upstream makefile distclean target in debian/rules clean target
   * fix description+synopsis
   * remove references to obsolete websites from README
   * rework packaging with debhelper
   * build html docs in /usr/share/doc/pdl/html/PDL and install doc-base
     entry for this
   * remove lintian override, slatec is now built with -fPIC
   * disable building of pdl.1p from pdl.PL, so the correct pdl.1p from
     Basic/Pod/Intro.pod is included
Files: 
 4b4ed097e1e7d46124a66170aee096c2 699 math optional pdl_2.4.2-1.dsc
 abf9261a2bcc1aa6b0a518de6caa6c3f 2090615 math optional pdl_2.4.2.orig.tar.gz
 67496edb83623fb16f578f0dce0b0ef9 9495 math optional pdl_2.4.2-1.diff.gz
 14b47c4b66fb5004a05cb2147d55b731 4681620 math optional pdl_2.4.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB47iOgjOm0i0vde8RAmckAKD8pywsz1mvYytOxQ2xTqyYN3KmcgCeMJ1G
ITrqEJWrFlddQHGZ6x3oH9I=
=/zg+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
pdl_2.4.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-1.diff.gz
pdl_2.4.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-1.dsc
pdl_2.4.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-1_i386.deb
pdl_2.4.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: