[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gtkmm2.0 2.2.12-1.1 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  7 Jan 2005 23:07:40 +0000
Source: gtkmm2.0
Binary: libgtkmm2.0-1c102 libgtkmm2.0-doc libgtkmm2.0-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.2.12-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bradley Bell <btb@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
Description: 
 libgtkmm2.0-1c102 - C++ wrappers for GTK+ 2.0 (shared libraries)
 libgtkmm2.0-dev - C++ wrappers for GTK+ 2.0 (development files)
 libgtkmm2.0-doc - C++ wrappers for GTK+ 2.0 (documentation)
Closes: 286233 287614
Changes: 
 gtkmm2.0 (2.2.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-Maintainer Upload (BSP)
   * Use a local docbook stylesheet instead of trying to download it from the
     web (closes: #287614, #286233).  Patch was provided by LaMont Jones.
Files: 
 b4b7ce5d814a7c70de5930d283f64bd6 758 libs optional gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.dsc
 458595781929daa734802082fde3feb9 132190 libs optional gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.diff.gz
 ef535996ac6f3d39952b02a6336e1a0e 3568008 doc optional libgtkmm2.0-doc_2.2.12-1.1_all.deb
 4ca54915950e5f7360e72ff5b2522a62 1732864 libdevel optional libgtkmm2.0-dev_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb
 385345541540fad1fccc84223cea5cc0 956092 libs optional libgtkmm2.0-1c102_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB3y2IK67kHwZE+rcRAln7AKCeJ9FbpRPzxdDi4MM4662WpZMKsgCggXE5
o4huoH87FKtC++liGOl1Fl8=
=Oqkx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.0/gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.diff.gz
gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.0/gtkmm2.0_2.2.12-1.1.dsc
libgtkmm2.0-1c102_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.0/libgtkmm2.0-1c102_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb
libgtkmm2.0-dev_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.0/libgtkmm2.0-dev_2.2.12-1.1_i386.deb
libgtkmm2.0-doc_2.2.12-1.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.0/libgtkmm2.0-doc_2.2.12-1.1_all.deb



Reply to: