[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted hotway 1:0.8-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  9 Nov 2004 19:47:13 -0700
Source: hotway
Binary: hotsmtp hotway
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: paul cannon <pik@debian.org>
Changed-By: paul cannon <pik@debian.org>
Description: 
 hotsmtp    - SMTP to Hotmail (HTTPmail) gateway
 hotway     - POP3 to Hotmail (HTTPmail) gateway
Closes: 229667 253720
Changes: 
 hotway (1:0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (closes: Bug#253720, "New upstream version")
   * Added hotsmtp package- but it does not 'just work'- since we have
     no special entry in /etc/services (I've asked for one, so we'll
     see what happens), you have to set one up yourself to run hotsmtp
     from inetd. Instructions are on the hotway website.
   * Added logcheck file to ignore "connect from localhost" messages-
     thanks to Alon Lischinsky <alon at gamebox.net>
     (closes: Bug#229667, "Hotwayd output appearing in logcheck")
Files: 
 eec9e0f01c289661fb9716004dfd8bbe 585 mail optional hotway_0.8-1.dsc
 aeb91c0d225d8f7de74c64f6ee765675 192159 mail optional hotway_0.8.orig.tar.gz
 423a502edc30c17c6e12feb1647b4321 20582 mail optional hotway_0.8-1.diff.gz
 f52e65fd2dd1180763277baf6c118afa 49830 mail optional hotway_0.8-1_i386.deb
 29f614956bfb3eb0dc338ecf8f51d593 45818 mail optional hotsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBkmJAUZSDC+wZs3gRAlYvAJ0S1wATnI5EZbJefiSPR0EiQO6UsACfQIC4
1nOECqRnSt61lBxwdD/xfTA=
=KHzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
hotsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hotway/hotsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb
hotway_0.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hotway/hotway_0.8-1.diff.gz
hotway_0.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hotway/hotway_0.8-1.dsc
hotway_0.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hotway/hotway_0.8-1_i386.deb
hotway_0.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/hotway/hotway_0.8.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: