[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted dpatch 2.0.9 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:35:53 +0200
Source: dpatch
Binary: dpatch
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
Changed-By: Gergely Nagy <algernon@bonehunter.rulez.org>
Description: 
 dpatch     - patch maintenance system for Debian source packages
Closes: 240709 242893 255476 259356 259662 260666
Changes: 
 dpatch (2.0.9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Nico Golde:
     + Fixed dpatch-convert-diffgz.1, patch from Helge
       Kreutzmann. (Closes: #242893)
     + Fixed dpatch deapply documentation, patch from Shaul Karl.
       (Closes: #255476)
   * Gergely Nagy
     + Fixed dpatch-edit-patch local information leak, patch from Darren
       Salt. (Closes: #240709)
     + Modified the default templates to call patch with -g0. Requested by
       John V. Belmonte. (Closes: #259662)
     + Extracted commonly used dpatch scriptlet code, providing two new
       ways to make a dpatch scriptlet shorter and lighter. See
       NEWS.Debian for details. Thanks to Tobias Grimm, Thomas Günther for
       their ideas. (Closes: #259356)
     + Made dpatch-edit-patch call dpatch deapply-all directly, upon
       cleaning. Request from Bastian Kleineidam. (Closes: #260666)
Files: 
 27a2cfca19cc74db9964f59c6127317b 545 devel optional dpatch_2.0.9.dsc
 e9379f8ed01c4e3a111d990c8ecd91f6 69289 devel optional dpatch_2.0.9.tar.gz
 91ef94c0896b67d678343239c5ce82e1 74234 devel optional dpatch_2.0.9_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBVxABR47eFMOy/N4RAlXsAJ97bxLiuNyWduibRwv4NWWDoiAqWgCcCK1a
+YXR6JZdXAZplC1oOrROiX8=
=s4LG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
dpatch_2.0.9.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.9.dsc
dpatch_2.0.9.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.9.tar.gz
dpatch_2.0.9_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.9_all.deb



Reply to: