[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted clamsmtp 0.8-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  7 Sep 2004 22:47:11 -0500
Source: clamsmtp
Binary: clamsmtp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chad Walstrom <chewie@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chad Walstrom <chewie@debian.org>
Description: 
 clamsmtp   - SMTP virus-scanning proxy
Changes: 
 clamsmtp (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Upstream Version
   * debian/README.Debian: Explained better the configuration decisions I made
     for this package.
   * debian/NEWS: Notified users of the differences between the experimental
     and unstable packages.
   * debian/init.d -> debian/clamsmtp.init,
     debian/defaults -> debian/clamsmtp.default: Moved to expected files for
     dh_installinit.  Removed much of the complexity of this defaults file
     because upstream added a config file, clamsmtpd.conf, to set most of these
     options.
   * debian/clamsmtpd.conf: New default configuration file for /etc
   * /var/lib/clamsmtp -> /var/spool/clamsmtp: conforming to the FHS.
   * debian/TODO, debian/.todo: devtodo generated TODO list
Files: 
 c7f45ac506cc9f4e818f4dff1577451f 577 mail optional clamsmtp_0.8-1.dsc
 971d34209af997f3a76be67683464d7e 128783 mail optional clamsmtp_0.8.orig.tar.gz
 b620eda1c464d020e62555c877663e42 5578 mail optional clamsmtp_0.8-1.diff.gz
 a1736b0428acbf3e83ae49a4452cb6ec 27692 mail optional clamsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBPo01DMcLGCBsWv0RAmuKAJ4/pBI0QeOnraF2DI9H5Zjl6sruYwCcCT9V
b6GolQczuP7+WIgkV1Fj/sg=
=Sdax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
clamsmtp_0.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/clamsmtp/clamsmtp_0.8-1.diff.gz
clamsmtp_0.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/clamsmtp/clamsmtp_0.8-1.dsc
clamsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/clamsmtp/clamsmtp_0.8-1_i386.deb
clamsmtp_0.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/clamsmtp/clamsmtp_0.8.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: