[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted auctex 11.14-really11.52-0.1 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:39:36 +0200
Source: auctex
Binary: auctex
Architecture: source all
Version: 11.14-really11.52-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Davide G. M. Salvetti <salve@debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description: 
 auctex     - An integrated environment for writing TeX/LaTeX documents
Closes: 120031 239799 244336 244342 245388 246908 257496 258304 265598
Changes: 
 auctex (11.14-really11.52-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU because the maintainer seems to be kind of MIA, with a version
     number that allows easy reverting, should he show up again before the
     freeze.
   * New stable upstream release (closes: #265598)
   * This also fixes the following bugs (closes:
     #257496, #244336, #245388, #246908, #120031, #244342, #239799)
   * Don't display an error message in a fresh install - patch is in BTS
     (Closes: #258304).
Files: 
 de0f6d1856ce9e0cfa02be2ba513730c 629 tex optional auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.dsc
 56f8d7e4461778fa0b6d48dfba612c85 457998 tex optional auctex_11.14-really11.52.orig.tar.gz
 47a35dd19c7670128ff5b82fe3eb3b98 23038 tex optional auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.diff.gz
 7b273f73026e7fff1b0706d2134b07e7 562802 tex optional auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBJ6fT+xs9YyJS+hoRAjW0AJ9xZVdqXAsyBeSQHqseKIOCqqLEOgCePhMD
aYoFwYJ7+7UkQwI5dIQQouI=
=MNOS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.diff.gz
auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1.dsc
auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.14-really11.52-0.1_all.deb
auctex_11.14-really11.52.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/auctex/auctex_11.14-really11.52.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: