[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted kernel-patch-2.4-preempt 20040321-2 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 19:34:06 +0200
Source: kernel-patch-2.4-preempt
Binary: kernel-patch-preempt-2.4 kernel-patch-2.4-preempt
Architecture: source all
Version: 20040321-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Description: 
 kernel-patch-2.4-preempt - Reduces the latency of the Linux kernel
 kernel-patch-preempt-2.4 - Dummy package providing kernel-patch-2.4-preempt
Changes: 
 kernel-patch-2.4-preempt (20040321-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Added support for kernel 2.4.27.
   * Removed support for kernels 2.4.19 through 2.4.23 are they are not
     available anymore in Debian.
   * Urgency is high because Sarge will include kernel 2.4.27.
Files: 
 2c22d135e01b70e6da27860824e60d95 612 devel extra kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.dsc
 5a64747d0c29f1d09ba97ce4d97b8b08 129381 devel extra kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.tar.gz
 acd21d9bac8caadc7efe6bbfeedd9a84 130960 devel extra kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2_all.deb
 7fab04fbfe4767f7d47fbaada25d0e9a 3626 devel extra kernel-patch-preempt-2.4_20040321-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBJOYWw3ao2vG823MRAm/FAJ9p/9Xsku0G++lvHgby7pvDR2sSOgCgjeyr
RISwyy3ilnUyngJyoqZ9YZA=
=tpDf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.dsc
kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2.tar.gz
kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt_20040321-2_all.deb
kernel-patch-preempt-2.4_20040321-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-2.4-preempt/kernel-patch-preempt-2.4_20040321-2_all.deb



Reply to: