[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted mew 1:3.3+0.20040512-1 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 22:56:18 +0900
Source: mew
Binary: mew mew-bin
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:3.3+0.20040512-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@vega.ocn.ne.jp>
Changed-By: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@vega.ocn.ne.jp>
Description: 
 mew        - Messaging in the Emacs World
 mew-bin    - The external commands for Mew
Closes: 232772 248466
Changes: 
 mew (1:3.3+0.20040512-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. (CVS snapshot, stable-3-2 branch on 2004-05-12
     at 22:39 +0900)
     - Fix that mewls fails when file size is zero.
   * debian/emacsen-startup.in: Set the mew-prog-ssl variable to
     "/usr/sbin/stunnel". (closes: #248466)
   * debian/control (Depends): Remove `emacs20'. (closes: #232772)
   * debian/emacsen-install.in: Create *.el symlinks.
Files: 
 b79f6cb12c628a2945bf3d738286d4a2 615 mail optional mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.dsc
 3671f3eb94b1acd2ea11c38227ac0bae 834534 mail optional mew_3.3+0.20040512.orig.tar.gz
 6e8b7d845be04e061e94248fbd82bf05 32020 mail optional mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.diff.gz
 bd9acf8e2388856260ecadc22c5aa0bc 690140 mail optional mew_3.3+0.20040512-1_all.deb
 305c717352464e514538ffde4aa3926a 43646 mail optional mew-bin_3.3+0.20040512-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAy+9m7qLvonfc4IMRAh1rAJ47FYr+rE4gh/O1ZX2BFGOR/hyOoQCgv2Tp
cn+hUxf7rogoWkh2MDDvHHc=
=u7qO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
mew-bin_3.3+0.20040512-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mew/mew-bin_3.3+0.20040512-1_i386.deb
mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mew/mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.diff.gz
mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mew/mew_3.3+0.20040512-1.dsc
mew_3.3+0.20040512-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mew/mew_3.3+0.20040512-1_all.deb
mew_3.3+0.20040512.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/mew/mew_3.3+0.20040512.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: