[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted evolution-data-server 0.0.93-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 00:37:34 +0900
Source: evolution-data-server
Binary: evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.93-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <kitame@debian.org>
Changed-By: Takuo KITAME <kitame@debian.org>
Description: 
 evolution-data-server - evolution database backend server
 evolution-data-server-dev - Development files for evolution-data-server
Changes: 
 evolution-data-server (0.0.93-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Build against libgnutls10
Files: 
 ba926b15071f8e1f7f45f1fd9efd3819 799 gnome optional evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.dsc
 6737d389e297394ca7fe9cd7f5f95f9b 6784867 gnome optional evolution-data-server_0.0.93.orig.tar.gz
 809e81b76a7c1aaeff8fd11234f2c643 3153 gnome optional evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.diff.gz
 61c4243c12aac703b0be058a2ef219fb 1076694 gnome optional evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1_i386.deb
 df1b263721255e3a53b8020b84a125dd 127666 gnome optional evolution-data-server-dev_0.0.93-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAshpdU+WZW1FVMwoRAicVAJ9aEopfBGPyEszkYoGRXwJRVQ089wCffsAq
206KSqhaXmyRnC//RL2leOA=
=kb9+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
evolution-data-server-dev_0.0.93-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server-dev_0.0.93-1_i386.deb
evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.diff.gz
evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1.dsc
evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_0.0.93-1_i386.deb
evolution-data-server_0.0.93.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server/evolution-data-server_0.0.93.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: