[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted apcupsd 3.10.13-2 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 15:32:16 +0200
Source: apcupsd
Binary: apcupsd-doc apcupsd-cgi apcupsd
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.10.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@debian.org>
Description: 
 apcupsd    - APC UPS Power Management
 apcupsd-cgi - APC UPS web interface
 apcupsd-doc - Documentation for apcupsd
Closes: 236042 240849 247935
Changes: 
 apcupsd (3.10.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added old patch to fix closing file descriptor (Closes: #236042)
   * Added some trick to make apcupsd removing even if it's not configured
     (Closes: #247935)
   * Apcupsd has been splitted on daemon and cgi package (Closes: #240849),
     however apcupsd binary still depend on libgd
   * Added a line on prerm to delete the old cron.daily script
Files: 
 ab794de626aa8618e4fffc0c66c4b814 727 admin extra apcupsd_3.10.13-2.dsc
 772be24d6a6c25a5817fefddec3e39a8 48898 admin extra apcupsd_3.10.13-2.diff.gz
 c5ed6bf70f0ae27974d32cf2405df7df 298358 admin extra apcupsd_3.10.13-2_i386.deb
 a5eeb165945474d3daa454d1facbbe9e 44262 admin extra apcupsd-cgi_3.10.13-2_i386.deb
 844807fbaafddf906e793ca392cebe65 2552818 admin extra apcupsd-doc_3.10.13-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAph5CzvFcH/JZfgQRAuQ3AJ9SIQAJVDZKvX8d7ZHtujkwB9Y59ACdEEPV
rlSy3P9yZLoDLQBPXovAQ1w=
=GAHB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
apcupsd-cgi_3.10.13-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-cgi_3.10.13-2_i386.deb
apcupsd-doc_3.10.13-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd-doc_3.10.13-2_all.deb
apcupsd_3.10.13-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.13-2.diff.gz
apcupsd_3.10.13-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.13-2.dsc
apcupsd_3.10.13-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apcupsd/apcupsd_3.10.13-2_i386.deb



Reply to: