Accepted razor 2.400-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 11:45:56 +1200
Source: razor
Binary: razor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.400-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Corrin Lakeland <lakeland@debian.org>
Changed-By: Corrin Lakeland <lakeland@debian.org>
Description:
razor - spam-catcher using a collaborative filtering network
Closes: 234043 240525
Changes:
razor (2.400-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream (quite a big change)
*
* Razor now supports syslog! (Lots of you have asked for this)
*
* If you are using razor system wide rather than per user, then
* turn on syslog logging for proper log support, log rotation, etc.
* Without syslog, razor logs to RAZOR_HOME, which defaults to /tmp.
* I am not going to change the default RAZOR_HOME to /var/log as one
* person requested because people that would not work for individual
* users (no write permission).
*
* I'm going to say that this change closes the bug request for logging
* to /var/log since syslog provides this (Closes: #240525)
*
* Updated the readme, making it clear razor-admin must be run
* (Closes: #234043)
*
* This code now integrates the variable tainting directly, so if it doesn't
* work for you, please report it as a bug.
Files:
5d9d7fffff2cc245df1ae03bbeed60a5 668 mail optional razor_2.400-1.dsc
ca1a340e13464661aa0efebd869fcebc 79800 mail optional razor_2.400.orig.tar.gz
39a480ba51ee2c9a1aaf0d575cdc366b 7435 mail optional razor_2.400-1.diff.gz
8a1f2e29fad20a1c13d5e3d67faa38ca 112248 mail optional razor_2.400-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAhNyYi5A0ZsG8x8cRApDWAKCMrEcjYmHYTMKLS3gefCW61fCQyQCfZiI8
6HXRzLyxhjpzJB/3Sv+vZhk=
=q6tD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
razor_2.400-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/razor/razor_2.400-1.diff.gz
razor_2.400-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/razor/razor_2.400-1.dsc
razor_2.400-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/razor/razor_2.400-1_i386.deb
razor_2.400.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/razor/razor_2.400.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: