Accepted xft 2.1.2-6 (powerpc source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:13:15 -0500
Source: xft
Binary: libxft-dev libxft2 libxft2-dbg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.1.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Description:
libxft-dev - FreeType-based font drawing library for X (development files)
libxft2 - FreeType-based font drawing library for X
libxft2-dbg - FreeType-based font drawing library for X (unstripped)
Changes:
xft (2.1.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Make package compatible with the XFree86 4.3.0 package reorganization.
- debian/control:
+ package build-depends on x-dev and libx11-dev instead of xlibs-dev
+ libxrender-dev depends on x-dev and libx11-dev instead of xlibs-dev
+ make libxft-dev conflict with xlibs-dev (<< 4.3.0) due to (now
undiverted) file overlaps
- debian/libxft-dev.preinst: remove diversions made by previous versions
of package if present
- debian/libxft-dev.postrm: deleted
Files:
773234980d1284b794d353b013f9b393 763 devel optional xft_2.1.2-6.dsc
de9fb1c0fc0cc17afc23deffe14c7817 218603 devel optional xft_2.1.2-6.diff.gz
5ab7936312010cb1a6316865433cf396 52762 libs optional libxft2_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
b6572fa2ed40c50e41c7e0f91f03c857 356100 libdevel extra libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
0b6705dbe6a65d9376d81668bc38045a 64634 libdevel optional libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkBQJxAACgkQ6kxmHytGonw8IQCfbmYs611d6wrU4fL++J0fDxmA
RUkAnRsOosaRiN9sLFENu6A9qcG2QlzM
=pJGI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft2-dbg_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
libxft2_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft2_2.1.2-6_powerpc.deb
xft_2.1.2-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xft/xft_2.1.2-6.diff.gz
xft_2.1.2-6.dsc
to pool/main/x/xft/xft_2.1.2-6.dsc
Reply to: