[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gtkmathview 0.5.2-3 (powerpc source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:20:52 +0100
Source: gtkmathview
Binary: libgtkmathview-dev libgtkmathview0 libgtkmathview-bin
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.5.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Description: 
 libgtkmathview-bin - A GTK widget for rendering MathML documents
 libgtkmathview-dev - A GTK widget for rendering MathML documents
 libgtkmathview0 - A GTK widget for rendering and editing MathML documents
Closes: 228548
Changes: 
 gtkmathview (0.5.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control
     - depends on newer libt1 (>= 5.0.0)
   * src/T1_FontManager.cc
     - uses newer libt1 method (Closes: Bug#228548)
Files: 
 8578e4a6ab32bbbc8d80733c8c94c6e4 799 devel optional gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.dsc
 9258263570b7eeb1cfe4800389ae7831 4470 devel optional gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.diff.gz
 763c63395bf1d81e9f74477a0358719d 409778 libs optional libgtkmathview0_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
 a13404533d1e0807424f87176cd1402c 708580 libdevel optional libgtkmathview-dev_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
 ce21762c6148759dabed0f6af3572c7c 30862 misc optional libgtkmathview-bin_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAD7kq1cqbBPLEI7wRAl77AJ9Y90crNOHTWkh49UCrEVdHzFy7wACeNb90
R4xnHC/oazNG9tBBowN7ADY=
=ifum
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtkmathview/gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.diff.gz
gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtkmathview/gtkmathview_0.5.2-3.dsc
libgtkmathview-bin_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmathview/libgtkmathview-bin_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
libgtkmathview-dev_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmathview/libgtkmathview-dev_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
libgtkmathview0_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtkmathview/libgtkmathview0_0.5.2-3_powerpc.deb



Reply to: