[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnome-sudo 0.3-1.1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  3 Jan 2004 23:19:45 +0100
Source: gnome-sudo
Binary: gnome-sudo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Description: 
 gnome-sudo - GUI frontend to sudo
Closes: 118472 133402 134521 217529
Changes: 
 gnome-sudo (0.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * 0-day NMU for bugs that have been open for quite some time
     - lintian clean of debian/control
     - Patch to fix gnome dialog (Closes: #118472)
     - Applied patch to avoid usage of gnome-sudo-helper, it is also
       no longer included in the package (Closes: #134521, #133402)
     - Patch to use -u option with sudo (Closes: #217529)
     - Patch to the manpage to describe a known problem (gnome-sudo
       will not warn if the program fails to work)
     - Added spanish translation, now that we're at it.
   * This package now belongs to QA since the maintainer is not
     responsive, also notice that it should need further cleanup.
Files: 
 42677089cc87dc0614a1e12fcf88c4b3 738 admin optional gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.dsc
 be79e229d133d1ae6e4bd9f7ae6588f3 4325 admin optional gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.diff.gz
 36ba9e8d1415493fd6048fa70a9d6934 12808 admin optional gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBP/dD2ftEPvakNq0lAQFKugP/UMWYnGKHvkHFSz6QtbTVcGjVP1Oxs2mP
T+MNtSZ0PTXIkk1uQckwJ3dOkkYFLbKkuAg7YlR1yuPFp1k43qbo7+Cht0cpJ9ip
mOMnRRHcdSSBHSfiYF8Ez6Kv7W0aNsFfjrYo6u3BrUHgEQu3vmufkE4hcygwy7VF
5gVWDqTlu6Y=
=5U1I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-sudo/gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.diff.gz
gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-sudo/gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1.dsc
gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-sudo/gnome-sudo_0.3-1.1_i386.deb



Reply to: