[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted nfs-utils 1:1.0.6-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:47:58 -0400
Source: nfs-utils
Binary: nhfsstone nfs-kernel-server nfs-common
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg <chip@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chip Salzenberg <chip@debian.org>
Description: 
 nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
 nfs-kernel-server - Kernel NFS server support
 nhfsstone  - NFS benchmark program.
Closes: 209370
Changes: 
 nfs-utils (1:1.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version:
     > Workaround glibc bug with large fd rlimits.
   * Japanese debconf translation from Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>.
     (closes: #209370)
Files: 
 fd15f07f58ea102149da2c1c40f676f2 619 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.dsc
 bc8b888c4ee93186dde91983f9600a65 266001 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz
 ce78d43a7e7ac020b856cdd03947002b 3693 net standard nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.diff.gz
 3d43a9978547e6163b7a135f3e04d922 92966 net optional nfs-kernel-server_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
 fd8ea9e7bf0f193166a91368a8a09ea8 57458 net standard nfs-common_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
 04033cba4a541df06960c9a0365fa164 39824 net extra nhfsstone_1.0.6-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/oCSae/7CYy/KUL0RAo2OAJ0Sv9d/IY7BhKi15HEa7WX9OGNdDACfY0Yt
HJLlaxf/W/JxJlKHHU/htZE=
=ETlh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
nfs-common_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
nfs-kernel-server_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.diff.gz
nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.6-1.dsc
nfs-utils_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz
nhfsstone_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nhfsstone_1.0.6-1_i386.deb



Reply to: