[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pong 1.0.2-9 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:00:07 +0900
Source: pong
Binary: libpong-dev libpong-common libpong0 pong
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>
Description: 
 libpong-common - Common files for making Preference/Property dialogs
 libpong-dev - development files for making Preference/Property dialogs
 libpong0   - a library for making Preference/Property dialogs
 pong       - Preference/Property dialogs maker for GNOME
Closes: 215893
Changes: 
 pong (1.0.2-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/libpong-common.prerm: doh. forgot to fix alternatives issue on
     this. (closes: Bug#215893)
   * debian/libpong-dev.prerm: likewise.
Files: 
 4c398b99df612c470eb014550bb68066 856 devel optional pong_1.0.2-9.dsc
 223c9311a35b6c9631f1f64f714f4d61 9296 devel optional pong_1.0.2-9.diff.gz
 a496251ac59520131111f923572d1ff5 118450 libs optional libpong0_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
 9ee130165775c658297da68638a1b032 88850 misc optional libpong-common_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
 0ce2bfa14b1312a465b403d96754aac0 160694 gnome optional pong_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
 e986f5c3f53e8fb64d3888c9da98da76 148502 libdevel optional libpong-dev_1.0.2-9_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/jVSm2QCnNZ2xmQQRAgMpAKCkrI7qCtrTKA94FLsXxS5fPXVLiACgo+RF
cxvjdffXeH5OlxRwQJKYQ80=
=+YOr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libpong-common_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pong/libpong-common_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
libpong-dev_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pong/libpong-dev_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
libpong0_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pong/libpong0_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
pong_1.0.2-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pong/pong_1.0.2-9.diff.gz
pong_1.0.2-9.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pong/pong_1.0.2-9.dsc
pong_1.0.2-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pong/pong_1.0.2-9_i386.deb



Reply to: