[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted kopete 0.7.2-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:17:46 -0400
Source: kopete
Binary: kopete
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matias Fernandez <radix@creativa.cl>
Changed-By: Matias Fernandez <radix@creativa.cl>
Description: 
 kopete     - Instant messenger program
Closes: 206090 206679 206792 207787 208411
Changes: 
 kopete (0.7.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New release (0.7.2)
   * This version resolves varius ICQ bugs (Closes: #208411)
   * Now, kopete appears to handle old configs (not fully tested, anyone?, please report)
     (Closes: #207787)
   * Fixed a crash when connecting to all (Closes: #206679)
   * Fixed file -> quit crash (Closes: #206792)
   * Since 0.7, kopete allows more than two accounts per contact (Closes: #206090)
Files: 
 49eb93c9ea6d9c1f063099042a6ad3b6 995 kde optional kopete_0.7.2-1.dsc
 90e48843010c5ef9c979c1ed9aa7cb06 5511548 kde optional kopete_0.7.2.orig.tar.gz
 98c081ec05cb9d3278332b78397fddf3 7285 kde optional kopete_0.7.2-1.diff.gz
 e81413e0a0e70d9074ebddb33cc0d1f0 2748124 kde optional kopete_0.7.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQEXAwUBP2XgHOtBmxovbdBzFAKyEAP/fSU204YJHyGnu7bqRNqFFaxMQ6eYMBUP
TJomG9UHPJsyCOEZMbafKzZVGXpDfSSxIbXKESGRqBEcltrQwHqt40SvcNukkAcs
e3YbczNEqw7U0XLBV5Z8dJZYl+yqHDXtsr3Jn57ZbU6GsBqnjjgk8FIH9yIJmdb+
f69z+GZf2PQEALeOzHfFgycUoWAgWZUhNRATAvr85fs5ujAHKJ27dlRC51sx2dBp
XZVX1eIrQXO2L+uxXXCNlBkFcJKdGe2hOuyDzpkZc1z3CSR2cjdG1nCWk8/QQcnp
LaSSl8+Tu8N5XkemuSyAwMLlAeerwBFcswNcsNSOqVx2IdJ3Yz6Epeo0
=qe8Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
kopete_0.7.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kopete/kopete_0.7.2-1.diff.gz
kopete_0.7.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kopete/kopete_0.7.2-1.dsc
kopete_0.7.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kopete/kopete_0.7.2-1_i386.deb
kopete_0.7.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kopete/kopete_0.7.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: