[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted vile 9.4-1 (sparc source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  9 Sep 2003 23:36:48 +1000
Source: vile
Binary: xvile vile-filters vile vile-common
Architecture: source sparc all
Version: 9.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brendan O'Dea <bod@debian.org>
Changed-By: Brendan O'Dea <bod@debian.org>
Description: 
 vile       - VI Like Emacs - vi work-alike
 vile-common - VI Like Emacs - support files for vile/xvile
 vile-filters - VI Like Emacs - highlighting filters for vile/xvile
 xvile      - VI Like Emacs - vi work-alike (X11)
Closes: 209342
Changes: 
 vile (9.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * Fix description for xvile (closes: #209342).
Files: 
 cb7fa7d28a2f3cbee7abd8e7dd72e621 644 editors optional vile_9.4-1.dsc
 1c69045467b7c48be99fa7ac2052a95f 1549606 editors optional vile_9.4.orig.tar.gz
 7e06a1403e156e008f17e5862a8c020c 6585 editors optional vile_9.4-1.diff.gz
 f91926f3354f63bdd892d365ed0b48cb 477226 editors optional vile-common_9.4-1_all.deb
 57f81699a6713f29d4e42bb30e62d780 276856 editors optional vile_9.4-1_sparc.deb
 9cf9818b578f4940cab4a6536495074f 381968 editors optional vile-filters_9.4-1_sparc.deb
 0940196cf478633e948898cc39e528e0 301742 editors optional xvile_9.4-1_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Xd9C8NyOALKMWZURAtPhAKCkqr40F86CiFMbR+jz74GNpHVNeQCfdOZt
FTV+743MdZfjAe2klfmvpJ0=
=35N7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
vile-common_9.4-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile-common_9.4-1_all.deb
vile-filters_9.4-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile-filters_9.4-1_sparc.deb
vile_9.4-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile_9.4-1.diff.gz
vile_9.4-1.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile_9.4-1.dsc
vile_9.4-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile_9.4-1_sparc.deb
vile_9.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/v/vile/vile_9.4.orig.tar.gz
xvile_9.4-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/v/vile/xvile_9.4-1_sparc.deb



Reply to: