Accepted conglomerate 0.5.4-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:55:10 +0200
Source: conglomerate
Binary: conglomerate
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>
Description:
conglomerate - an XML editor for GNOME
Changes:
conglomerate (0.5.4-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release :
- The executable is now named "conglomerate", rather than "conge"
- Major rewrite of the node "Properties" dialog. It's now modeless,
a lot tidier, and supports the renaming of attributes.
- The display spec can now specify that Conglomerate should override
the standard node property dialog for a tag, and use one from a plugin
instead. I've begun the implementation of one of these plugins: a dialog
that handles the standard attributes that are present on nearly every
DocBook tag.
- We no longer depend on eel or libbonoboui, which should make it easier
to build
- We now depend on libglade, which should make it much easier to support
things like accessibility.
- Numerous minor fixes
Files:
35a46d40d1fa757ea86b22ce1b4cc055 579 text optional conglomerate_0.5.4-1.dsc
43e9a1c29fc4a096a03a0496db25a0c6 427122 text optional conglomerate_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
b8d79c8b28f615131d80f99186e5a3e0 5101 text optional conglomerate_0.5.4-1.diff.gz
f5951f65d1402687b3a8ba5f61fa65f4 135468 text optional conglomerate_0.5.4-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE++brw2WTeT3CRQaQRAvKpAKCoCss0esFBjAabc/hLuP5I0lCWbgCfaaj6
FElvjG+nZSq58C+G5Cpdj8A=
=aUPD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
conglomerate_0.5.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/conglomerate/conglomerate_0.5.4-1.diff.gz
conglomerate_0.5.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/c/conglomerate/conglomerate_0.5.4-1.dsc
conglomerate_0.5.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/conglomerate/conglomerate_0.5.4-1_i386.deb
conglomerate_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/conglomerate/conglomerate_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: