Accepted xcursor 1.0.2-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:35:13 +0900
Source: xcursor
Binary: libxcursor1-dbg libxcursor-dev libxcursor1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <ishikawa@debian.org>
Description:
libxcursor-dev - X Cursor management library (development files)
libxcursor1 - X Cursor management library
libxcursor1-dbg - X Cursor management library (unstripped)
Changes:
xcursor (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* I'm back and Initial official upload release.
* libraries moved into /usr/lib/{,debug} instead of
/usr/X11R6/lib/{,debug} (adapt Debian policy section 12.8.7.)
* drop conflicts: xlibs* (>> 4.3.0-0), xlibs* (<< 4.3.0-0pre1v1)
because versioned AND conflicts are not supported.
Files:
20f5859a69595fd610f8482af27ca34e 764 - optional xcursor_1.0.2-1.dsc
b2dddaa6a1df0ae2419317e3093c8006 220154 - optional xcursor_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
220f5bc93ace89d32b466c6a296e1d01 2740 - optional xcursor_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
82bcaa12e3a886454073e2694ae9d8ad 19758 libs optional libxcursor1_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
9ec0327e83fe76b4fa6dd51ff9913932 112978 libdevel optional libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
4e94cf2249a706a77506df46c20dba42 27296 libdevel optional libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj7biZoACgkQfi8w7uypT6gRPACgrec9lrZd5uQsUF/xosOw5/Ow
1zoAoJV4pPByg8WyagSoXIGPKnFYZsH5
=3Zgp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
libxcursor1_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor1_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
xcursor_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xcursor/xcursor_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
xcursor_1.0.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xcursor/xcursor_1.0.2-1.dsc
xcursor_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xcursor/xcursor_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: