Accepted galeon-snapshot 1.3.3.20030322-1 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:27:35 +0000
Source: galeon-snapshot
Binary: galeon-snapshot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.3.20030322-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Howard <mh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <mh@debian.org>
Description:
galeon-snapshot - GNOME web browser for advanced users
Closes: 185171 185445
Changes:
galeon-snapshot (1.3.3.20030322-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New CVS Checkout
* Fixed build depends. Closes: #185445, #185171
* Now depends on stable mozilla >= 1.3
* Removed suggests (no longer useful)
* Added mozilla-mail recommendation (required to get mailto: links working, even
with gnome mail handler)
* Rewrote description
* Updated reportbug presubj
* Standards -> 3.5.9. No changes
* As galeon1 conflicts with the Debian mozilla package, we will soon move
galeon2 to the mail galeon package. Please report any bugs you find in
galeon-snapshot
Files:
cf664c4c0d216279020a6c26c5b85248 1085 web optional galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.dsc
28cddc0ef105235da8117506c489428a 2629284 web optional galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322.orig.tar.gz
ea1b173dd429c9b43c15fd9dd3347ccb 35234 web optional galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.diff.gz
ada5b0e6de44487fea107d64c1d53c95 2161380 web optional galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+fgSZRIB09ZZvujwRAmdLAKCSlNg7fPphtHN7TE2XOVDaSWWKmQCfSk4r
MsupQ80q/IPlnMAvjEDlDQI=
=xXu0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/galeon-snapshot/galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.diff.gz
galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/galeon-snapshot/galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1.dsc
galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/galeon-snapshot/galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322-1_i386.deb
galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/galeon-snapshot/galeon-snapshot_1.3.3.20030322.orig.tar.gz
Reply to: