[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gcc-snapshot 20030309-1 (m68k source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 01:39:15 +0100
Source: gcc-snapshot
Binary: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: source m68k
Version: 20030309-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Description: 
 gcc-snapshot - A SNAPSHOT of the The GNU Compiler Collection
Closes: 183891
Changes: 
 gcc-snapshot (20030309-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * CVS 20030309, taken from the gcc-3_3-release branch.
   * This one using --enable-sjlj-exceptions again.
   * README.snapshot: Add paragraph how to setup a wrapper (closes: #183891).
Files: 
 3e8d95505c6b4549d3efdf31e786f4e2 1346 devel extra gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.dsc
 20d257b40885c4083f3263e73a2ad2ed 20758792 devel extra gcc-snapshot_20030309.orig.tar.gz
 34de0f1a1771e58149c25ebc40bfbb68 58118 devel extra gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.diff.gz
 c916b68f2bb3699c2a9abe83a391183a 17056980 devel extra gcc-snapshot_20030309-1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.

iQEVAwUBPnJBxAuDzMCIcnEhAQFnPQf+NeWw/pAGUiLPneFUXrQ/5ZXvUUXsNHnc
W14NA5pbsZaFBYCgHi3xpdeYZJZbCwn6mQ+VRXfE6paEeFhLYTT4AthMGbMp0xyx
CmU6mS2DIZn2iI0wPP1wwrnulYJpuh8WoHX2c5WtcalpOcArO+7kLo2++BI/TP1D
Q3RXs0eiFZm0XCJc6m+bDP456bUj1gI9+R22hYpE7OU2i25BS45fsm2yKxCiXNzE
z+ue/QMRJqqIcH4komQO5YNwCKbk/MZSo0oNRxe4avdvzlAGLGVrRr1/oSHXodA3
ld6FI/bct9LF/jgY5/ewBc9mYjvgFNTKekWDsSza0s9HHPg0EaEkFg==
=xrq+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030309-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20030309-1_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030309-1_m68k.deb
gcc-snapshot_20030309.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030309.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: