Accepted xchat 1.8.10-5 (i386 source all)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:34:10 +0100
Source: xchat
Binary: xchat-gnome xchat xchat-common xchat-text
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.8.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) <evo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Davide Puricelli (evo) <evo@debian.org>
Description:
xchat - IRC client for X similar to AmIRC
xchat-common - Common files for X-Chat
xchat-gnome - IRC client for GNOME similar to AmIRC
xchat-text - IRC client for console similar to AmIRC
Closes: 170086 171462 171814
Changes:
xchat (1.8.10-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* The "Cramer" release.
* Added 09_browser.patch to add sensible-browser support;
closes: #170086.
* Renamed 07_fontset.patch to 07_misc.patch, now:
- xchat real name defaults to GECOS user name; closes: #171814
- away messages aren't announced by default; closes: #171462.
Files:
c01d499027c3064b99b2fe8edad2157c 906 net optional xchat_1.8.10-5.dsc
64a3cd60972c0ae496567d5d6e6b363c 39206 net optional xchat_1.8.10-5.diff.gz
8a73aa6bbd025aede400bf2b51fccc4f 703482 net optional xchat-common_1.8.10-5_all.deb
983959ca816ac088ae1cdf1d1f8f9d2c 194876 net extra xchat-gnome_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
c4c9c1b5df63b49fdb5bd00a13f77dec 103468 net optional xchat-text_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
62239d5b9c2817849bccd45239e511f9 188440 net optional xchat_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE99P4+t3FMESjlf3ARAjbUAJ44r2kNHj0Rkiks2VwWtIf0AuYoggCfSNdS
UnsrRVShgsflCrH51+vifUA=
=AM5A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
xchat-common_1.8.10-5_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat-common_1.8.10-5_all.deb
xchat-gnome_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat-gnome_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
xchat-text_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat-text_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
xchat_1.8.10-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat_1.8.10-5.diff.gz
xchat_1.8.10-5.dsc
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat_1.8.10-5.dsc
xchat_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xchat/xchat_1.8.10-5_i386.deb
Reply to: