Accepted amavis 20020517-20 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:40:37 +1000
Source: amavis
Binary: amavis-exim amavis-milter amavis-postfix
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20020517-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Changed-By: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Description:
amavis-exim - Interface between MTA and virus scanner.
amavis-milter - Interface between MTA and virus scanner.
amavis-postfix - Interface between MTA and virus scanner.
Closes: 161832 162310 162798
Changes:
amavis (20020517-20) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Only delete amavis user on purge.
* Only try to add alias entry once, not three times. Once is enough...
* Disable spam checking support, it was broken with perl 5.8 and
not recommended for use.
* Remove dependancy on razor (closes: #162798, #161832, #162310),
it was broken with the replacement of razor v1 in Debian with razor
v2.
Files:
57bdc3fcfa255ee58c30cdba8539e428 991 mail extra amavis_20020517-20.dsc
f5f31215ec110404e99a481f99b3b69b 39345 mail extra amavis_20020517-20.diff.gz
9ef0fd0745481642f0d6ae958d941fd4 151616 mail extra amavis-postfix_20020517-20_i386.deb
2435e03d2f4a317c53ee893d9f5ef589 159394 mail extra amavis-milter_20020517-20_i386.deb
879d15ec27f968c5d36503c84f890dbf 150100 mail extra amavis-exim_20020517-20_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj2XyicACgkQuCinHABTDCTxvACdEfIaCnKHyK0iMEWEUk4QDa7z
F+wAoJ4vu6gOmVKiTkLsSf2oqJODVMHm
=SBBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
amavis-exim_20020517-20_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/amavis/amavis-exim_20020517-20_i386.deb
amavis-milter_20020517-20_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/amavis/amavis-milter_20020517-20_i386.deb
amavis-postfix_20020517-20_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/amavis/amavis-postfix_20020517-20_i386.deb
amavis_20020517-20.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/amavis/amavis_20020517-20.diff.gz
amavis_20020517-20.dsc
to pool/main/a/amavis/amavis_20020517-20.dsc
Reply to: