Accepted gdk-pixbuf 0.19.0-2 (i386 source)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 01:46:29 -0700
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Binary: libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libgdk-pixbuf2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.19.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
Description:
libgdk-pixbuf-dev - The GdkPixBuf library - development files.
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev - The GNOME GdkPixBuf library - development files.
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 - The GNOME Canvas pixbuf library
libgdk-pixbuf2 - The GdkPixBuf library.
Changes:
gdk-pixbuf (0.19.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* apply patch to work around libtool bug #57087
Files:
f2eecbf4b62621c14791366107b62c82 736 libs optional gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.dsc
0f4dc0032ecc867f973151012994158a 14581 libs optional gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.diff.gz
31c60ad5696c8060ecf61ad4d824d5b9 152088 libs optional libgdk-pixbuf2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
f14877bbd115b1bf42a79e6587e156a0 6996 libs optional libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
19d0c914671db248daf009c63e394631 141250 devel optional libgdk-pixbuf-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
50225cb4e362df67aecf0390a4923751 7422 devel optional libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9gvijN2Dbz/1mRasRAmT+AJ9yBhAqSDsiP5Y9oM+r5+cixQj2qACfQlhn
te4W6C3zlcV9pTKwKifRSds=
=w2r+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.diff.gz
gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.dsc
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_0.19.0-2.dsc
libgdk-pixbuf-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
libgdk-pixbuf2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf2_0.19.0-2_i386.deb
Reply to: