[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pcre-ocaml 4.28.2-1 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:50:04 +0200
Source: pcre-ocaml
Binary: libpcre-ocaml libpcre-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.28.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Description: 
 libpcre-ocaml - OCaml bindings for PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expression)
 libpcre-ocaml-dev - OCaml bindings for PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expression)
Closes: 158231 158248
Changes: 
 pcre-ocaml (4.28.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Rebuilt against ocaml 3.06 (Closes: Bug#158248, Bug#158231)
   * Changed deps and build-deps to ocaml-3.06 and ocaml-base-3.06
     accordingly to the new ocaml packaging policy
   * Changed ocaml-findlib from recommends to depends
Files: 
 23ecee25e603c2ffe88296eabdf1af74 627 devel optional pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.dsc
 f724aff023714e1d53dc8c390fa7b33d 39886 devel optional pcre-ocaml_4.28.2.orig.tar.gz
 a55fd30de8078506e5689cff581d2814 11240 devel optional pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.diff.gz
 29c0267bdb55294f23572c73c194f992 12012 libs optional libpcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1_i386.deb
 68971e7b70a23a418d5dad1241910e2c 58114 devel optional libpcre-ocaml-dev_4.28.2-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9ajOQ1cqbBPLEI7wRAgIdAKCZFEKwUkHJU3neLBLCO1vVdBMUWQCfcF37
41OL+ykCycmbxHRGLysUaGY=
=eRZ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
libpcre-ocaml-dev_4.28.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcre-ocaml/libpcre-ocaml-dev_4.28.2-1_i386.deb
libpcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pcre-ocaml/libpcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1_i386.deb
pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcre-ocaml/pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.diff.gz
pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pcre-ocaml/pcre-ocaml_4.28.2-1.dsc
pcre-ocaml_4.28.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pcre-ocaml/pcre-ocaml_4.28.2.orig.tar.gz



Reply to: